Tēnā kotou katoa.

I have had two very different experiences in the last week that were refreshers on what it is to be Māori in the New Zealand film industry.

The first was when I attended the down-home  Māoriland Film Festival in Otaki from last Friday to Sunday, run by Māori power couple Libby Hakaraia and Tainui Stephens.

The festival is in its second year and brought together a programme of Māori, Aboriginal Australian, Sanmi and other indigenous features, shorts and documentaries for the enjoyment of the predominantly local population, although a number of our filmmaking colleagues attended from Aotearoa, Australia, Canada, Scandinavia, and the U.S. A Māori short I produced in 2013 was one of the films on offer.

Otaki is the home of Ngāti Raukawa, who moved to the area with Te Rauparaha in the 1800s, and the site for tertiary education provider Te Wānanga o Raukawa.

The architecturally stunning Nga Purapura Wānanga of Fitness Facility provided one of the screening venues and it’s where I watched the Māori story The Dead Lands for the first time. (I say Māori story because I subscribe to the Ngā Aho Whakaari definition of a Māori film as a film with a Māori story, and with Maori in the three key creative positions of writer, director and producer.) The other two screening venues were the local hall and the small Civic Theatre.

In this small community from which festival director Libby comes, the aroha, whanaungatanga, manaakitanga and kotahitanga were clearly evident. I felt a part of the Hakaraia extended whānau, welcomed by both whānau and iwi who played an integral part in the festival, and at one with the place and the people, both of the land and the industry. This is the penultimate experience of a Māori event for me. This spirit is not limited just to Māori , though. I felt the same way at imagineNATIVE, the world’s largest indigenous film festival in Toronto, and at the Pacific Islanders in Communications Conference and the Hawaii International Film Festival on Oahu, which I attended last year.

Māoriland is a celebration of indigenous storytelling on screen, and continues a tradition started by the Wairoa Māori Film Festival, which sees its 10th anniversary this year.

The second experience was when I was fortunate enough to be invited to the set on the first day of shooting for The Patriarch, which kicked off on Wednesday.

It’s been twenty years since director Lee Tamahori and producer Robin Scholes worked together on Once Were Warriors. They have come together again to put on screen Witi Ihimaera’s novel Bulibasha, about two warring shearing gang families.

My colleague and friend Brad Haami is Māori consultant on the film in the absence of kaumātua Hare Williams due to illness; Robin my old boss from years ago. I spent the morning listening as Brad engaged with core cast Temuera Morrison and Nancy Brunning over Māori aspects of the script.

Once Were Warriors paved the way for the commercial and or critical success of Māori stories and Māori films to come, from Whale Rider, The Dead Lands and The Dark Horse to Boy, Mt. Zion and The Pa Boys. It also catapulted Lee Tamahori into the directing big leagues of an international career. It was an honour to hear Lee as he addressed the crew, telling them what it meant to him to be returning to filmmaking in New Zealand after all that time to make The Patriarch, a film based on a story from his own rohe. And I clearly saw a Māori director who was in charge of his film and his vision.

Māori stories and films are the unique differentiator for New Zealand film in the international marketplace. And on the domestic scene they make up six of the top 10 box office successes, with Boy sitting at No. 1.

In an interview with Māori Television’s current affairs programme Native Affairs, actor and Sundance Film Festival founder Robert Redford, who is here for the filming of Disney’s Pete’s Dragon, said  that New Zealand is like a country with a smile on its face. In the film world, Māori in front of and behind the camera are increasingly bringing smiles to the faces of domestic and international audiences, filmmakers and film industry people alike.

That’s got to be good for all of us.

Have a happy and safe Easter!

 

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

Last updated on 12 March 2018

20 March 2015

On Tuesday evening I was fortunate to attend the 25th anniversary celebration of New Zealand on Air, hosted by Broadcasting Minister Amy Adams at Parliament.

The crowd of 300 or so included many producers whose programmes have received funding from NZ on Air across those 25 years; a number acknowledged with awards for their programmes including The Down Low Concept for Seven Days, Whitebait-TV for What Now, Attitude Group for Attitude TV, TVNZ for Country Calendar, South Pacific Pictures for Shortland Street and Moana Maniapoto for the music video A E I O U. Everyone of course was thankful for NZOA support.

In the last newsletter, I made mention of Ruth Harley’s acknowledgment of a misstep, which was over a quota for New Zealand broadcasting. Yet in spite of that, NZ on Air has made a significant contribution to getting a broad spectrum of New Zealand programming on screen. But that’s the past. What about the future?

NZ On Air’s digital efforts have occasioned criticism, but some truly innovating programming has come about because of it. Reservoir Hill went on to win an Emmy Award. Other successful digital initiatives include digital portal Coconet TV, web series Flat 3 by our very own Roseanne Liang and the short documentary platform Loading Docs. NZ on Air’s latest initiative is the Canada – NZ Digital Fund, which will hopefully deliver some innovative digital co-production programming.

What else is happening on the New Zealand digital landscape?

TVNZ seems to have finally woken up to the value of data as you now have to subscribe to their revamped OnDemand service. Spark has upped its investment in Lightbox, which is now freely available to Spark home broadband customers. Sky’s Neon has launched with little real fanfare and nothing much more than a dated back catalogue, and Netflix NZ is almost upon us. But what do these and the other digital offerings mean for dedicated online NZ content? Not much so far, particularly for the pay services with the dominance of offshore shows.

Viewfinder has sought to corner NZ web series on its webserieschannel and by the look of it, it has—you can probably binge watch them all in a weekend. But are web series the answer?

In September of last year, journalist James Rawson wrote in The Guardian about the demise of web series at the hands of Amazon Prime and Netflix.

The success of shows such as House of Cards and Arrested Development on Netflix has some Kiwi programme makers longing for the opportunity to make their New Zealand equivalents, leaving the production of low or no budget web series to others. This could well make sense. In the same Guardian article, successful web drama creator Ingrid Jungermann, of hit F to 7th fame is quoted as saying that: “It’s inevitable that web series will mirror film and split into two camps – indie web series creators who produce and distribute on their own, and “studio” web series creators who produce content for online channels. On one hand, you retain freedom of expression and ownership while going broke, and on the other hand, you exchange vision and voice to make a living.”

With little opportunity for the latter, we could well be left to the penniless former without the NZ On Air digital funds that are helping to create dedicated New Zealand online content .

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

Last updated on 12 March 2018

5 March 2015

Faced with a blank page and no hot topic I’m left to update you on some of the recent traffic across my desk.

Screen Industry New Zealand (SINZ) got together last week for the first time in over a year. SINZ is an informal gathering of guilds (Writers, Directors & Editors, Producers, Actors) and associations (WIFT and Nga Aho Whakaari) to share information and highlight those issues that affect us all, and individually. SINZ does not have the mandate to speak or act collectively. Rather, it’s a conduit for communication so that we can all stay up with the state of play. Discussion centred on digital rights, the ongoing changes at the NZFC and gender equality. While we all have a different take on issues, we can also see where thinking meshes. From a DEGNZ perspective, expect to see us working more collaboratively with other organisations to help achieve tactical and strategic objectives.

If you follow the DEGNZ Facebook page, you may have noticed a post announcing that the Australian Directors Guild (ADG) was officially recognized as a union last week. This is a major achievement by the ADG after years of struggle, and deserves our heartfelt congratulations. The ADG can now legally represent all their directors in negotiations with producers. The power of the Directors Guild of America and the Directors Guild of Canada lies in their ability to negotiate collectively on behalf of their members, setting work terms and conditions as well as providing other services and benefits. New Zealand has for many years now been a union-unfriendly environment, as evidenced most recently in our industry by The Hobbit and Outrageous Fortune disputes. Rest assured that even without collective bargaining power, how to assure the creative, cultural and financial wellbeing of our members is at the forefront of the minds of the DEGNZ board and staff.

Last week saw the launch of the Vista Foundation, an organisation set up by cinema and film software solutions company Vista Group. The foundation is joining together with the NZFC to launch a marketing and distribution training programme for selected filmmakers led by long time producer John Barnett. This is just one of many initiatives Vista hopes to get behind. It’s a matched funding arrangement that sees private and government cash come together around film. NZFC CEO Dave Gibson is enthusiastic about getting private money into the industry, so that filmmakers become less reliant on the NZFC as the funding source. Not everyone has the pulling power of Jermaine Clement and Taika Waititi to raise US$400,000 plus in a marketing and distribution crowdfunding campaign however, so filmmakers will welcome the up to NZ$75,000 carrot the NZFC is offering top dog out of the programme.

Next week the Minster of Broadcasting Amy Adams is hosting a 25th anniversary celebration of New Zealand On Air (NZOA) content. While Dr Ruth Harley in her John O’Shea Memorial Address at the SPADA conference in late November last year lamented the serious mistakes she made when leading the organisation, we still have much to thank NZOA for. Without a public broadcaster in sight these days, NZOA still helps deliver a broad range of content on screen that wouldn’t get made without it. Let us hope there are more anniversaries to celebrate with them.

Finally… what a difference a little over a year and five percent makes. I was speaking to a producer yesterday who has struggled to crew a feature film about to shoot. Everybody’s busy—crew anyway. The NZ Screen Production Grant is doing the business, particularly with international productions. More importantly, international TV series shooting here are on the up. This means drama directors and editors have the opportunity to gain long term employment working on projects with big budgets and lots of toys, especially if the shows move beyond a first series. But what about NZ feature film and the employment opportunities there for directors and editors?

The NZFC’s development and production budgets aren’t seeing any significant increases. Development (including training) has remained relatively static at around $2million per year for the last five years, while production financing seems to have been going down year on year, from just under NZ$16 million in the 2009 – 10 period to just over NZ$10 million last financial year (changes in reporting methodology may account for some of this difference.)

Yes, last year we had a much higher number of NZ films hit theatres than usual, thanks primarily though to the lo-budget flow through from Escalator and other schemes. Budgets for film are being driven down globally for features.

One NZFC response has been to target low-budget films in the $250 – 500k range with an emphasis official or not on genre product. Another is to keep first time director budgets to under $1. 5 million or so. These initiatives could well help to keep the number of films up to the level of last year. The inevitable outcome here however as occurred with Escalator is that pay rates are forced down to fit the budgets—More jobs, but less pay.

At the Hawaii International Film Festival last year I suggested to the Oahu Film Commissioner that she apply a small tax to every incoming production to help stimulate the almost non-existent local dramatic feature film industry—an idea that would go down like a lead balloon here.

Maybe it’s time for NZFC budget increases to get our filmmakers busier, and hopefully pay them what they are worth.

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

 

Last updated on 12 March 2018

18 February 2015

Why are there so few female directors making dramatic feature films in New Zealand?

It’s a vexing question with no easy answers.

A couple of stats drawn from published NZFC data:

  • Of the 28 dramatic features (discounting Hollywood and overseas independents) released with NZFC investment from 2010 to April 2014, four (14%) were directed by women (Simone Horrocks, Roseanne Liang, Kirstin Marcon, Juliet Bergh), of which one was a micro-budget Escalator film.
  • And of the 99 shorts funded in the NZFC Fresh and Premiere Shorts initiatives from 2010 – 2015, 36 (36%) had female directors.

The gathering that attended the DEGNZ/WIFT panel discussion on gender imbalance in the NZ screen industry chaired by Kim Hill at Auckland’s Basement Theatre in August last year came up with one idea to address the issue: A motion was passed to approach the NZFC to ask for state funding, [to pursue] gender equality through positive discrimination that will be in place for a certain amount of time until it’s not needed, so that women’s work can have a special place where applications go.

The motion came about from the discussion that night that mooted a number of potentially influencing factors. Amongst them were:

  • It’s a market driven industry where the main cinema audience is males aged 18 – 35.
  • Feature film directing is bloody hard work and all consuming, putting a considerable number of women off the job.
  • Women’s stories tend towards more complex arthouse drama, without the whams, bams and kapows of boysie films, so they are less appealing to the mainstream audience.
  • The psychology of filmmaking has been influenced primarily by men, pushing female protagonists and women’s stories to the sidelines.

Another cause suggested was that the gatekeepers are a key reason why the number of female directors is low. So I took a look at the NZ film gatekeepers to see how the gender statistics stacked up.

In the last five NZFC annual reports, 44 board members including the chairs were listed, with 12 of those female (27%), one the chair for all five years.

Across the same period, we had one CEO, Graham Mason, thus 0% female.

In the same timeframe, Marilyn Milgrom departed as Head of Development to effectively be replaced by Graeme Mason, and then Lisa Chatfield, making two out of three Heads of Development female (66%). And of the seven development executives listed for those years, excluding the Heads, three were female (43%). The full development teams across that time with Graeme Mason included gave a 50/50 gender split. (Although there is a significant lead time for feature film, I did not look earlier when Ruth Harley was CEO and Caroline Grosse Head of Development.)

These gatekeeper stats don’t look too bad, except we could obviously do with more women on the NZFC board.

How about the screenwriting?

In the NZFC statistics on gender released in September last year we see that female writers made up 34% of applications going in for development funding, and 29% of those who received development funding.

Of the 28 features looked at earlier, 7 had female screenwriters credited (25%) while with the 99 shorts, I identified 33 females (33%) as the screenwriters.

Does this mean that if we funded more female writers for feature development, we would get more films greenlit that are written by women and thus more films directed by women? This is a possibility, particularly with the propensity for NZ feature films to be the output of writer/directors.

NZFC is aware of the gender inequality issue and considering how best to respond.

A number of the guilds are debating it as well and taking action as they see fit.

At DEGNZ in the last year, we lost three key female board members in Leanne Pooley, Kirstin Marcon and Briar March, each for personal reasons. We were fortunate to recruit to the board director Louise Leitch and editor Annie Collins who joined director Roseanne Liang, giving females three of the 10 seats (30%). Director Kezia Barnett has taken up an Advisory Board role with the guild strengthening the numbers. With our selection panels, we are seeking at least a 50/50 split in gender terms. However, there is much more to be done, both at DEGNZ and in the industry at large.

Gender inequality in the screen industry will be a hot topic when Screen Industry New Zealand convenes later this month to look at the issues we face. And we are all interested in what strategies and initiatives the NZFC will devise and implement. Hopefully they will allow Jane Campion to unclench her jaw a little more when next asked to comment about it.

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

Last updated on 12 March 2018

5 February 2015

We are already into February and Waitangi Day is almost upon us. For those of you unfamiliar with Te Tiriti o Waitangi (The Treaty of Waitangi) or wanting to brush up on the detail, here’s a good primer on the NZ History website.

Waitangi Day and issues around the Treaty are lightning rods for debate and discussion from all sides. This is a good thing.

My mind today went to two documentaries made by DEGNZ members that previously brought Māori issues to the fore: Peter Berger’s docudrama Waitangi – What Really Happened? and past guild president Dan Salmon’s documentary 2050: What If… Māori Gain Sovereignty – Tino Rangitiratanga?

There are many of our members who have worked on projects that have laid the issues out for deliberation.. And so have others. Even Gareth Morgan’s getting on the bandwagon. This is all good; even the redneckery (a new word), because it requires us to review our thoughts and opinions about rights, fairness and justice for all New Zealanders.

Here’s my little fuel to the fire for the coming weekend.

I am of the opinion that te reo Māori should be a compulsory subject at pre-school, primary, intermediate and secondary levels.

The reason I advocate for compulsory te reo in schools is because I believe bilingualism opens our eyes wider to the world and its cultures, making us more accepting of cultural differences.

Bilingualism is a positive.

Te reo Māori is a non-English language that we can have the easiest of access to, not just through schools, but through our neighbours, communities, marae, and the airwaves thanks to Maori Television and the Iwi Radio Network, amongst others. And te reo is ours. Another unique asset.

Radio New Zealand (RNZ) and the televison networks make a bilingual effort every Te Wiki o Te Reo Māori (Māori Language Week). RNZ now carries it through the rest of the year. This is to be applauded.

I was heartened to read of the protests this week outside the Bilingual Unit at Richmond Road School, just down the street from the guild office (I can’t see it from up here, though). Budgets had been ‘adjusted,’ and some parents believed it was to the detriment of the bilingual education happening there.

At a more personal level, I have admired the efforts of actor Jennifer Ward Leland (Actors Equity President) to use the reo.

There’s room for everyone to increase the usage of te reo Māori, especially in the media and screen industries. The Dead Lands gave us a great example on the big screen.

So this weekend why don’t you give the reo a try if you’re not already using it. Speak te reo Māori this Waitangi Day, even if it’s just to call someone a hua.

You’ll be making a contribution to bilingualism and te reo Māori language advancement, idotic statement or not.

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

Last updated on 12 March 2018