View from the Top banner

The Big Screen Symposium has run its course for another year. This time around, it had an emphasis on local content makers on the big and small screen, with micro-budget productions getting a good share of the limelight.

I moderated a session with DEGANZ director member Callum Devlin and actor and director Chelsea Preston-Crayford, who took wildly different pathways to their debut features.

Callum did it in a collaborative, micro-budget effort with his creative partners on The Weed Eaters, while Chelsea took the more traditional development and production path with Film Commission funding on Caterpillar.

In another session, Daniel Betty (What Lies Between), Matt Hicks (The Tavern), and Tom Levesque and Eva Trebilco (Shut Eye, Notes From A Fish) spoke about the trials, tribulations and joys of making, marketing and distributing their own micro/low-budget films.

In 2024, we ran a session on low-budget feature filmmaking with Tom Levesque (Shut Eye), former DEGANZ board member Michael Duignan (The Paragon) and Tom Sainsbury (Loop Track), who spoke about the production of their self-funded features for less than $500k.

The approach outside the traditional funding body path is more prevalent than ever. Government funding for films is tightening, and financing productions through traditional means is becoming harder.

But it’s not just on the big screen where filmmakers are finding their way forward.

The incredible success of YouTuber Curry Barker with horror feature Obsession, made on a reported “micro-budget” of US$750k for a box office gross of US$400 million plus, has driven Hollywood studio offers for him to direct. His feature opportunity came off the back of his YouTube channel short, The Chair, which attracted the attention of Obsession’s US producer James Harris.

YouTubers Viva La Dirt League, who operate out of their fan-funded $4.2 million studio lot in Henderson West Auckland, are intent on a similar pathway from YouTube to feature.

Back in 2009, Uruguayan Fede Alvarez, director of the Evil Dead remake for Rob Tappert and Sam Raimi and which was shot here, got the offer to make his debut feature because of his YouTube short Ataque de Pánico!.

The traditional path of film shorts to features has paid off, too.

Jackie van Beek’s trajectory came off the back of multiple film shorts that led to her first feature Inland Road, before going on to her now successful career as a director of film, TV and commercials.

Also at BSS, Kiwi director James Ashcroft spoke about his pathway from shorts to features, starting with his low-budget NZFC debut feature Coming Home In The Dark. This led to directing films with John Lithgow and Geoffrey Rush (The Rule of Jenny Penn), Robert De Niro (Whisper Man), and most recently Emilia Clark and Natascha McElhone (When Darkness Loves Us).

The landscape for feature filmmaking has certainly changed, but the number of pathways to making that first film has expanded. All you need is bloody-minded perseverance and a little bit of luck.

Making that first film, however, isn’t always a precursor to career success as a filmmaker, even if you’re talented. So celebrate the achievement if you do it. Every film that gets made deserves it, whether or not it’s a hit.

 

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

View from the Top banner

Last night I attended the Doc Edge Awards 2026, which recognised the best New Zealand and international documentaries submitted to the fest, along with some special awards for contributions to documentary.

Chief among those was the Raye Freedman Legacy Award that went to DEGANZ board member and documentary maker Kim Webby.

This award recognises outstanding female storytellers in the documentary film industry. Kim is a deserved winner.

I’ve known Kim for more than 30 years, from the time she was a current affairs reporter at TVNZ, prior to her move into documentary-making.

As a reporter, she was principled and relentless. As a documentary maker, she has proven herself time and time again as a director and producer of factual TV and feature documentary. Her latest film Unlikely Kin, co-directed with DEGANZ member Mike Jonathan, is showing at Doc Edge over the next month. Don’t miss it.

There were many other notable acknowledgements, but the one I’d like to point out is the Doc Edge Superhero Award 2026 that went to editor Tim Woodhouse. Tim is the long-time collaborator of DEGANZ member, former board member, and NZ doco powerhouse Leanne Pooley.

Tim and Leanne have been a creative team across many of her films and her latest factual series, Choir Games. Perhaps most notable because of the recent passing of Kiwi icon Dame Jools Topp was their work on feature The Topp Twins: Untouchable Girls, which won the hearts of NZ and international audiences alike.

Other key awards that stood out were those that went to Best New Zealand Project Desiderium: What Stood Here, created by Ellie Adams, and Best International Project The World Came Flooding In, created by Van Sowerwine and Isobel Knowles.

I haven’t kept my eye on immersive projects, even though I first noted them at the 2017 Cannes Film Fest when Alejandro González Iñárritu made history with his groundbreaking virtual reality project, Carne y Arena (Virtually Present, Physically Invisible). It was the first immersive work ever presented as an Official Selection at a major film festival.

Immersive has clearly come a long way. You can see the 12 projects on offer at Doc Edge, including the winners, at the Smith & Caughey’s building in the Auckland CBD. It runs daily from 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM until July 12.

Even in these difficult times for the screen industry both domestically and internationally, it’s heartening to see that documentary is alive and well, as exhibited through the shorts and features selected for Doc Edge.

The struggle and passion for documentary storytelling, and the heartbreaking stories that get revealed through this medium, were on display last night. None more so than the film that won the Best New Zealand Documentary and Best New Zealand Editing Awards, featherStrength. Filmmaker John Earle, who documented his own journey to meet the relentless demands of raising a child with severe developmental challenges, was near wordless and close to tears both times he was acknowledged for his achievements.

I’ve yet to see the film, but it’s undoubtedly worth watching.

 

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

View from the Top banner

Every once in awhile we get contacted at the guild by producers or other individuals wanting recommendations for directors, editors or assistant editors.

And I can tell you, we do get contacted about Hollywood projects as well.

To be fair to all of our members, we are unable to make recommendations to these inquirers.

Rather, we refer them to our membership directory, where we tell them they can search for director, editor, assistant editor, and by genre.

Of course, if a member hasn’t filled out their profile in our directory, they miss getting considered for the opportunities that come along.

The next disadvantaged lot are those who don’t keep their profiles up to date, don’t include some detail about themselves, just put an external link to an outside website or streaming site, or even worse, a link that goes to a social media account that is private and requires a request to get access.

Yes, it’s only a click away, but there’s an opportunity to engage with a bio/filmography or statement and to talk directly to the visitor right there and then on the DEGANZ site, without making them do one more click before they learn something.

The old advertising maxims of The Hook, The Value Proposition, Proof and Credibility, and Call to Action are worth considering. Done properly, the directory visitor will really want to go where you want them to, to learn more about you and your work.

And don’t forget, people don’t necessarily contact us first. They can just go directly to our membership directory.

In the end, you are asking the interested party to consider you if there is even an inkling that you might be right for the role.

In our time-poor world, it’s easy for those scrolling through to blow someone off if they don’t find anything worthwhile immediately.

And that brings me to the headshot.

There’s debate about whether or not to include a headshot, with pros and cons. But one thing is de rigueur if you are going to include one: have it look as professional as possible. This doesn’t mean you should have a passport-style mugshot. There are ways to inject your personality into a good photo, particularly if you have someone who knows how to use a camera to do your shot for you.

Of course, if you are well known in New Zealand for what you do, then maybe it’s not so important that you have a good profile on our site.

But what if Hollywood, Europe or the UK come calling? Just saying…

 

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director

The A Kōrero with… blog series is back for 2026! This time, DEGANZ’s Izzi spoke with Music Supervisor Aminé Ramer to hear all the ways music plays its part in screen productions.

An award-winning music supervisor and consultant, Aminé has helped define the sound and emotional tone of feature films, documentaries, and television series. Her work is driven by a strong sensibility for connecting sight and sound to create a visceral audience experience, along with deep expertise in music rights and the complexities of the clearance process. Her credits span numerous international productions, including the Academy Award–nominated and Peabody Award–winning documentary Crip Camp, and the Apple TV+ drama series Shantaram. She has also contributed to a range of Aotearoa screen projects, including recent features Tinā; The Rule of Jenny Pen; Big Girls Don’t Cry; Red, White & Brass; and Baby Done.

In this kōrero, Aimné shares how she has one foot in the screen world and one in the music world, her secret to keeping track of thousands of songs, and her favourite part of her job.


Izzi: What is a music supervisor’s role on a project? 

Aminé: The music supervisor is the head of the music department. We oversee everything music-related on a project and work creatively with the director to help facilitate the project’s musical vision. 

Ideally, we’re brought in before shooting begins, so we help shape the tone, present musical options, find the right composer, and make sure the music budget aligns with the project’s creative expectations.

Izzi: In fairly simple terms, what does your workflow look like?

Aminé: The workflow starts with reading the script and creating a document to track anytime music is mentioned. I also add ideas if the script doesn’t specifically mention anything. Like if a scene is set in a shop, I’d add a note that the shop could have music playing in the background. So I make sure to account for all the music possibilities based on the script.

Then I’ll talk with the director about their creative vision and with the producer about the budget to make sure that the creative expectations and budget are aligned. After that, I start gathering ideas for songs and potential composers. If there are specific songs in the script, I’ll get quotes to see whether we can get approval and how much it’ll cost.

There may also be some practical stuff. Like if the script says, ‘Michael sings to his beloved as they’re sitting on the farm,’ I need to figure out what the song is, if the actor can sing, if they need a vocal coach, if there will be a backing track, and how the song will be recorded. So, I’m coordinating with the sound person, the first AD, and the director about all of that.

Once filming wraps, I’ll have conversations with the editor and hopefully prevent any random temp tracks from being used. Ideally, the composer can send through temp music options.

I’ll also present music options that fit creatively and the budget. That way, the editor isn’t spending hours cutting to the perfect song that we can’t afford or clear. Even if I only send five options through, I may have gone through 500 tracks to get there.

A large part of my job is making sure communication channels are open, especially in post-production when things move much faster. I’m seeing footage, working with the composer, looking through hundreds of songs, sending emails, checking prices, and discussing whether scenes work better with a pre-existing song or something original. The director ultimately calls the shot, but everyone’s talking through the options.

There are a lot of moving parts, but it keeps me on my toes.

Aminé with Christopher Peterson and Adam Dorn (aka Mocean Worker) at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York / Photo provided

Izzi: How do you go about getting the costs and rights for songs?

Aminé: I use a platform called Disco, which means I’m regularly sent music from major labels, publishers, and managers, complete with metadata attached to each track. So a lot of the information I need is already there.

If I don’t have that information, or if there’s something very specific written into the script, then I’ll go to APRA or Recorded Music NZ to find out who owns the master rights.

Every good music supervisor has strong contacts across labels, publishers, and independent managers. I spend a lot of time listening to music, going to shows, and building relationships within the music community. That means I sometimes hear music before it’s released, or I can call a manager directly and inquire about a song for a project.

Izzi: What’s your creative process in the role?

Aminé: The creative process is the whole reason I do the job. It’s my favourite part.

My creative process begins after reading the script and discussing tone with the director and producers. We’ll talk about whether they’re open to counterpoint. For example, instead of playing a scene straight with a love song, maybe there’s something more unexpected that works better emotionally.

From there, I start figuring out what options I want to present. Sometimes that means getting the exact song they’ve written into the script, but I’ll also prepare alternatives in case it doesn’t fit the budget, or even suggestions that might work better creatively than the original reference.

That’s the part I really love — matching music to visuals. I often have access to unreleased music, emerging artists, or older tracks that aren’t as widely known, and it’s exciting to find the perfect fit for a scene. It’s quite an intuitive process.

Izzi: How do you keep track of all of your music knowledge? Is it like a massive Rolodex in your brain?

Aminé: I start with instinct, thinking about what might feel right for the scene. I’ll make playlists of songs that immediately come to mind, but I also keep a huge library of playlists organised by emotion or tone, like happy, sad, driving, or counterpoint.

I’ll go through those first, and if nothing feels right, then I’ll reach out to labels, publishers, or managers with specific requests. They’ll send back options they think fit the brief, and often listening through those will send me down another creative rabbit hole.

I also keep a long-running wish list of songs I love that could work for certain types of scenes. Because I’m constantly listening to music, I’ll often hear something and save it for later.

But sometimes things change when you actually see the footage. The pace or edit can completely shift what the music needs to do. A song that worked on the page suddenly feels wrong, or the scene needs a totally different energy. Sometimes I’ll play a scene back and immediately know the perfect track. Other times, I’ll go through hundreds of songs against the picture before finding the right one. But finding out what doesn’t work is just as valuable as finding out what does.

And honestly, I love that process too.

The best feeling is watching a finished scene and knowing the music helped elevate it emotionally. That’s why working closely with the editor and director is so important. Music supervision isn’t just about finding a song or getting a clearance quote; it’s about shaping how the music actually functions emotionally within the scene.

Clearances are also part of the job, but they’re only one part of it.

Aminé with fellow music supervisor Evyen Klean at the 9th annual Guild of Music Supervisors Awards / Photo provided

Izzi: Can you speak more to how you balance the creative and admin aspects of music supervision?

Aminé: The difference between being a music supervisor and just doing clearances is huge. If the role were only clearances, I don’t think I’d do it as a job, because what I really love is the creative side and the music itself.

That said, to be good creatively, you also have to be excellent at clearances. There’s no point pitching what you think is the perfect song to a director, only to later discover there’s an uncleared sample in it or that it’s completely out of budget. At that point, you’ve wasted everyone’s time.

So you really need to be strong at both sides of the job. 

I tend to separate them mentally. Some days are creative — listening, searching, matching music to scenes — and other days are admin-focused — dealing with quote requests, negotiations, pricing, and rights clearances.

It genuinely feels like using two different parts of your brain.

Izzi: You’ve mentioned that you work closely with the director and editor, as well as keeping the producer in the loop. I’m curious about the specific working relationship with the composer.

Aminé: It’s really important that everyone is closely aligned. 

You don’t want the composer going off and writing something that ends up competing with a song or vice versa. I’ve spent hours looking for the perfect track only to find out the composer is already covering that moment. Or the composer has spent days on a cue only to find out the director wanted a song. So communication is key between all the key creatives.

A big part of the process is deciding whether a scene should use a pre-existing track or an original score. That’s what happens in spotting sessions.

Once there’s a rough cut, the director, composer, and music supervisor should all sit down together and watch the film to make notes. I’ll be noting where I think music can come in, the composer is marking where the score should come on, and the director is shaping the overall vision. Then we compare notes, discuss ideas, and map out who is doing what.

At that stage, anything from the script or early temp work might still be in the cut, and that can be really useful. Sometimes it confirms what’s working and we move forward with it, and other times it becomes clear we need to change direction completely.

Spotting sessions are really about making sure everyone is on the same page before post-production moves forward. The director ultimately makes the final decisions, but the composer and music supervisor are working closely together throughout the process, so the creative and practical sides stay aligned.

Aminé in Venice, where she lives for part of the year / Photo provided

Izzi: What’s something you wish collaborators knew when working with a Music Supervisor?

Aminé: A lot of it comes down to seeing the music supervisor as an integral part of the creative team.

With collaborators I’ve worked with for a long time, that understanding is already there, and things run smoothly. But when starting with someone new, they may not realise how different my role is compared to someone who just handles clearances.

Also, people often don’t see the amount of work involved. It’s long days, multiple conversations with rights holders, and the fact that only one song will ultimately be chosen while several others are cleared and then not used. I sometimes wish I could fully communicate the scale of that work, but part of my job is to manage it quietly and keep the process moving so the production isn’t overwhelmed by it.

The role is all-encompassing. As a key part of the music department, we’re involved in the creative process, not just getting prices. We have a wealth of musical knowledge and experience that we bring to the table to help facilitate the filmmaker’s vision. Ultimately, we’re there to make the work the best it can be.


This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

View from the Top banner

So… Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Paul Goldsmith (Minister for Public Service; Digitising Government; Arts, Culture and Heritage; Media and Communications) got together and announced that the government is embarking on a fundamental overhaul of the public service to improve services, lift productivity and deliver better value for money.

Government departments will be merged, public service staffing will be reduced from 1.2% of the population to 1% over time, at a loss of an estimated 9000 jobs.

What does that mean for us, you might wonder?

If you look at Goldsmith’s Amplify: A Creative and Cultural Strategy for New Zealand, which I’ve written about previously, you can see similar themes emerge, the predominant ones of which are:

More bangs for the buck.

And:

There ain’t no more money, honey.

Taking both into account, I’m going to moot some possible outcomes should National get back into power with its Wegovy-like approach to the public service.

The Mergers
NZFC and NZ on Air will merge. Just like government departments, the Nats will look to a single streamlined screen funding body with fewer people doing more work, but without more funding. In fact, probably less. NZFC was gearing up for the merger for quite a while, with a fair bit of jockeying to ensure they came out on top. This shotgun marriage is an inevitability no matter who gets into power, so we’ll just have to live with it.

The TVNZ/RNZ merger won’t come back. The two are such incompatible partners with different kaupapa. I just can’t see their colours being changed for them.

Commercial Imperatives for Screen
‘Art for art’s sake’ is not a National catch cry. So what is seen as a better return on investment?:

  • More commercial fare
  • Export-driven content
  • More private sector investment
  • Continued international service production

This isn’t all bad, but in the auteur film space, only A-list and top genre-specific festival success will suffice, or you’re going to need to pull box office. In regard to export product, if we don’t get more funding and better conditions to create our own IP, we’re just going to meander along like we always have, with the occasional hit to keep us juiced. Games will ultimately outstrip traditional screen and prove an easier draw for funding under this government—it’s scalable. Private sector money will remain mostly a philanthropic exercise without greater investment incentives. Someone should take a look at the Belgian Tax Shelter or the Luxembourg Audiovisual Support System for possible solutions. Governments love invisible exports, and international screen production here delivers it. It ain’t going anywhere. The broader arts eco-system, however, is going to suffer.

Next week, Nicola Willis will deliver Budget 2026, which will shed more light (or throw more shadow) on the future of Screen. Thankfully, we are seen in government circles as an export industry as well as part of the cultural sector. This could well be our saving grace.

 

Tui Ruwhiu
Executive Director